Goldsmith v. Davis, et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/9/2011 ORDERING that 25 Order is VACATED. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES K. GOLDSMITH, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:10-cv-1995 KJN P L. DAVIS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 On August 22, 2011, this court directed defendant Davis to pay the U.S. Marshal 17 the costs of personal service of summons, or to show cause why such costs should not be taxed. 18 (Dkt. No. 25.) Defendant has now shown cause why such costs should not be taxed. (Dkt. No. 19 26.) Defendant correctly states that the U.S. Marshal, after initially requesting reimbursement 20 (Dkt. No. 21), then withdrew the request (Dkt. No. 24). As set forth in the declaration of A. 21 Brodbeck, filed by defendant, the U.S. Marshal initially sought reimbursement due to the 22 temporary misplacement of defendant Davis’ timely signed waiver of service.1 (Dkt. No. 26 at 23 6.) 24 //// 25 26 1 Thereafter, the court misconstrued as duplicative the U.S. Marshal’s request for reimbursement, and request to withdraw such request. 1 Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this court’s 2 order filed August 22, 2011 (Dkt. No. 25) is vacated. 3 DATED: September 9, 2011 4 5 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 gold1995.taxcosts

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?