Alturas Indian Rancheria v. Salazar, et al
Filing
73
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/20/2011 ORDERING 72 further Settlement Conference set for 5/12/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; The hearing on the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and the Defendants' and Intervenor's Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 6/20/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Status Reports due by 6/6/2011. (Reader, L)
1
4
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
SYLVIA QUAST
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2740
5
Attorneys for Federal Defendants
2
3
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ALTURAS INDIAN RANCHERIA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
KENNETH SALAZAR, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
____________________________________)
No. 2:10-CV-01997-LKK-EFB
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING ON MOTIONS AND
ORDER
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:
March 28, 2011
10:00 a.m.
4, 15th Floor
Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton
18
19
WHEREAS at the March 28, 2011, hearing on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
20
Judgment and the Defendants’ and Intervenor’s Motions to Dismiss, the Court continued the
21
hearing until May 9, 2011, and required the parties to submit status reports no later than April 25,
22
2011 (See Order dated March 30, 2011, Docket # 65); and
23
WHEREAS the Court also ordered the parties (including Darren Rose, Jennifer
24
Chrisman, Joseph Burrell, Phillip Del Rosa, and Wendy Del Rosa) to attend a mandatory
25
settlement conference on April 15, 2011, before Magistrate Judge Brennan (See Order dated
26
March 30, 2011, Docket # 65); and
27
WHEREAS at the end of the April 15 settlement conference, the parties (including
28
Darren Rose, Jennifer Chrisman, Joseph Burrell, Phillip Del Rosa, and Wendy Del Rosa) agreed
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING
1
to attend a further settlement conference on May 12 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge
2
Brennan (See Minutes for Settlement Conference held on 4/15/2011, Docket # 71);
3
4
NOW THEREFORE the parties to this action hereby stipulate and respectfully request
that the Court enter an Order as follows:
5
1.
The parties shall attend a further mandatory settlement conference on May 12,
6
2011, at 9:30 a.m. before the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan, United States Magistrate Judge.
7
The following individuals are required to attend the mandatory settlement conference, along with
8
counsel: Darren Rose, Jennifer Chrisman, Joseph Burrell, Phillip Del Rosa, and Wendy Del
9
Rosa.
10
2.
The hearing on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the Defendants’
11
and Intervenor’s Motions to Dismiss currently set for May 9, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. is continued to
12
June 20, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.
13
3.
The parties shall submit status reports no later than June 6, 2011, rather than by
14
April 25, 2011. The status reports shall contain an update on the administrative proceedings and
15
a statement as to whether any settlement was reached at the mandatory settlement conference.
16
Respectfully submitted,
17
Dated: April 18, 2011
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
18
19
By:
20
/s/ Sylvia Quast
SYLVIA QUAST
Assistant United States Attorney
21
Attorneys for Federal Defendants
22
23
Dated: April 18, 2011
FREDERICKS PEEBLES AND
MORGAN, LLP
24
/s/ Steven John Bloxham
STEVEN JOHN BLOXHAM
25
26
Attorney for Plaintiff
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING
1
Dated: April 18, 2011
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE FOR
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
2
/s/ Neil D. Houston
NEIL D. HOUSTON
3
4
Attorney for California State Defendants
5
6
Dated: April 18, 2011
RAPPORT AND MARSTON
7
/s/ Lester John Marston
LESTER JOHN MARSTON
8
9
Attorney for Intervenor Alturas Indian
Rancheria
10
11
12
ORDER
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated: April 20, 2011.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?