Urbano v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 27

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/5/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of $5,750.00 as compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff, to date, by counsel. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 8 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8926 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Daniel.Talbert@ssa.gov 9 Attorneys for Defendant 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 12 CARLOS URBANO, Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 ) Case No. 2:10-cv-02007-EFB ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ) THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT ) TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) Commissioner of Social Security, ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned 19 counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that the previously filed Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) application is hereby withdrawn. 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned 21 counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the 22 EAJA in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY dollars and 0 cents 23 ($5,750.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of 24 Plaintiff, to date, by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 25 2412. 26 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government 27 will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff's 28 attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment Stip. & Order for EAJA 1 1 will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the United 2 States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and expenses 3 is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 4 Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the 5 Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause 6 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Bess M. Brewer, pursuant to the 7 8 9 10 11 12 assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security 13 Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. 14 15 16 Respectfully submitted October 4, 2011. Respectfully submitted, Dated: October 4, 2011 17 18 /s/ Bess M. Brewer (As authorized via email) BESS M. BREWER Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 19 20 21 Date: October 4, 2011 22 23 By s/ Daniel P. Talbert DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant U. S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Michael J. Astrue 24 ORDER 25 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: October 5, 2011. 27 28 Stip. & Order for EAJA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?