Johnson v. Da Costa, et al
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/2/2010 ORDERING 9 that Defendants Carlos M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust; Claudina M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust shall have until 11/16/2010 to respond to complaint. (Reader, L)
Johnson v. Da Costa, et al
Doc. 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Scott N. Johnson Plaintiff, vs. Carlos M. Da Costa, et al, Defendants
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No.2:10-cv-02020-LKK-KJM STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL NOVEMBER 16, 2010 FOR DEFENDANTS CARLOS M. DA COSTA INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE, AND THEIR SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES, OF THE DA COSTA LIVING TRUST; CLAUDINA M. DA COSTA INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE, AND THEIR SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES, OF THE DA COSTA LIVING TRUST TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a), Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson and Defendants, Carlos M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust; Claudina M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust, by and through their respective attorneys of
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
record, Scott N. Johnson; Guy D. Borges, stipulate as follows:
1. An extension of time has been previously obtained for Defendants Carlos M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust; Claudina M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust until November 2, 2010 to respond or otherwise plead reference to Plaintiff's complaint. 2. Defendants Carlos M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust; Claudina M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust are granted an extension until November 16, 2010 to respond or otherwise plead reference to Plaintiff's complaint. 3. Defendants Carlos M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust; Claudina M. Da Costa
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust response will be due no later than November 16, 2010.
IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of November 1, 2010
Dated:
November 1, 2010
/s/Guy D. Borges___ ___ Guy D. Borges, Attorney for Defendants Carlos M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust; Claudina M. Da Costa Individually and Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated:
November 1, 2010
/s/Scott N. Johnson ____ Scott N. Johnson, Attorney for Plaintiff
IT IS SO ORDERED: that Defendants Carlos M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust; Claudina M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust shall have until November 16, 2010 to respond to complaint.
Dated: November 2, 2010
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?