Habig v. McAllister et al

Filing 54

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/27/13 ORDERING that pursuant to the parties stipulation, the Clerk is directed to close the case and and all pending matters before this Court as to the above- entitled action are hereby taken off calendar as moot. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3

Kathleen M. Kerekes
Kerekes Law Corporation
555 Capitol Mall, 9th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]

4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff, DAVID HABIG

6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID HABIG,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

vs.
W. McALLISTER, et al.,
Defendants.

) Case No.: 2:10-cv-02022 LKK-EFB P
)
)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
)
STIPULATION FOR DIMISSAL
)
[FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
)
)
)
)

16
17

On March 25, 2013 the parties, by and through their counsels of record, submitted a

18

Stipulation for Dismissal to dismiss the above-entitled matter in its entirety as to all claims and

19

all Defendants pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). All parties who have appeared in this action

20

have stipulated to the dismissal. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Clerk is directed to close

21

the case and and all pending matters before this Court as to the above-entitled action are hereby

22

taken off calendar as moot.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated: March 27, 2013

25
26
27
28

__________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DIMISSAL [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
- 1-