Yeager v. Aviat Aircraft, Inc. et al

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/19/10: Defendant's 17 MOTION to QUASH is DENIED. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOANNA R. MENDOZA, State Bar No. 148320 LAW OFFICES OF JOANNA R. MENDOZA P.O. Box 2593 Granite Bay, CA 95746 (916) 781-7600 (916) 781-7601 FAX jmendoza@theIPlawfirm.com PETER R. TOLLEY FOSTER, SWIFT, COLLINS & SMITH, P.C. 1700 East Beltline, N.E., Suite 200 Grand Rapids, MI 49525 (616) 726-2211 (616) 726-2299 FAX ptolley@fosterswift.com Attorney for Plaintiff GENERAL CHARLES E. "CHUCK" YEAGER (RET.) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GENERAL CHARLES E. "CHUCK" YEAGER (RET.) Plaintiff, v. AVIAT AIRCRAFT, INC., a Wyoming Corporation, and STUART HORN, an Individual residing in the State of New York, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:10-CV-02055 JAM EFB ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT HORN'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF PROCESS AND DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION -1Order Denying Defendant Horn's Motion to Quash and to Dismiss PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 After consideration of the moving and reply papers filed by the defendant, STUART HORN, in support of his Motion to Quash Service of Process and Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, the opposition papers filed by plaintiff, GENERAL CHARLES E. "CHUCK" YEAGER, and the arguments of counsel during the hearing on November 17, 2010, the defendant's motion is hereby DENIED. Date: November 19, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge -2Order Denying Defendant Horn's Motion to Quash and to Dismiss PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?