Solomon v. Negrete et al

Filing 110

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/04/13 granting 109 Motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline until after the court has ruled on plaintiff's motion to compel. If the court denies plaintiff's motion to compel, dispositive motions shall be filed 14 days after the court issues the order. If the court grants plaintiff's motion to compel, dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 30 days after the responses to the discovery are due. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 No. 2:10-cv-02103 WBS-AC VINCENTE SOLOMON, v. Plaintiff, [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS J. NEGRETE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Good cause appearing, the motion of Defendants Barajas, Campbell, Franco, Garcia, 19 Lundy, Medrano, Norgaard, Prior, Stallcup, Torres, Vasquez, and Wright to extend the 20 dispositive-motion deadline until after the Court has ruled on Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF 21 No. 109) is granted. 22 If the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion to compel, dispositive motions shall be filed fourteen 23 days after the Court issues the order. If the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to compel, dispositive 24 motions shall be filed no later than thirty days after the responses to the discovery are due. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 4, 2013. ` ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 Order Extending Deadline to File Dispositive Motions (2:10-cv-02103 WBS-AC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?