Solomon v. Negrete et al
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/17/2011 ORDERING that the warden has DISCHARGED the 42 Order pursuant to the All Writs' Act, by timely 46 response from the appropriate prison legal officer. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
VINCENTE SOLOMON,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
No. CIV S-10-2103 WBS GGH P
vs.
J. NEGRETE, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
17
1983. By order, filed on September 15, 2011, the court invoked the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. §
18
1651(a), for the limited purpose of determining why prison officials were refusing to provide the
19
requisite copies of the amended complaint which this court had ordered, sufficient for plaintiff to
20
return fourteen copies, along with the summons and completed USM-285 forms, in order for the
21
court to direct service of process in this action. The court had, in order to lessen the burden on
22
prison staff, previously reduced the number of pages of the amended complaint that needed to be
23
copied from seventy-five (75) to eleven (11). See Order, filed on July 27, 2011 (docket # 38).
24
Only after plaintiff continued to complain that he still could not obtain copies of the amended
25
complaint and provided some basis for the assertion (see Order, filed on September 15, 2011
26
(docket # 42) did this court require a response from the warden at California Correctional
1
1
Institution (CCI) in order that the court would not lose its jurisdiction in this matter. In a timely
2
response, dated September 27, 2011, P. Grant submitted a declaration stating that he or she is the
3
CDCR employee who is the Legal Officer assigned to the law library facility at CCI where
4
plaintiff is incarcerated. Docket # 46, Declaration of P. Grant, ¶ 2. P. Grant offers an
5
explanation of the process for obtaining requests for legal materials and copies by inmates, like
6
plaintiff, who are confined to SHU housing in Facility 4B at CCI. Grant Dec., ¶¶ 3-4. According
7
to P. Grant, plaintiff originally submitted a request for copies of 275 pages of documents and did
8
not include any court order specifying the pages of the first amended complaint to be copied or
9
the date by which the copies needed to be made. Id., at ¶¶ 6-7. Once P. Grant learned of the
10
September 15th and July 27th orders, he/she made copies of the first amended complaint and
11
provided plaintiff with the fourteen copies of the eleven-page complaint, along with three manila
12
envelopes for mailing; an exhibit showing plaintiff’s acknowledgment of receipt of the items is
13
attached. Id., at ¶¶ 8-9 & Exhibit B. P. Grant declares that had plaintiff provided the July 27th
14
order and the eleven-page complaint, the necessary copies would have been made and avers that
15
there was no obstruction. Id., at ¶¶ 10-11. P. Grant goes on to state that plaintiff makes inflated
16
requests in excess of the supplies or copies the prison permits but that the office makes an effort
17
to provide plaintiff with the maximum copies or supplies allowed during a week with only the
18
excess denied; it is also stated that plaintiff loses track of his own numerous requests to the legal
19
library via institutional mail. Id., at ¶¶ 12-14; see also Exhibit A.
Exhibit B to the Grant declaration indicates that plaintiff was supplied the
20
21
fourteen copies of his amended complaint along with three envelopes on September 21, 2011.
22
As of October 11, 2011, plaintiff has supplied the court with the requisite documents for service.
23
The court will find that the show cause order directed to the warden has been discharged.
24
Service of the amended complaint will be directed by separate order.
25
\\\\
26
\\\\
2
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the warden has discharged the order issued
1
2
pursuant to the All Writs’ Act, filed on September 15, 2011 (docket # 42), by a timely response
3
from the appropriate prison legal officer on September 27, 2011 (docket # 46).
4
DATED: October 17, 2011
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
GGH:009
solo2103.ord7
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?