Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Khinda et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/13/12 DISMISSING action without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that provided no party referenced has filed a motion to reopen this action by 2/5/12, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. First Library Square 1114 Fremont Avenue South Pasadena, CA 91030-3227 Tel: 626-799-9797 Fax: 626-799-9795 TPRLAW@att.net Attorneys for Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC., CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02104-WBS-EFB 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 AMARJIT SINGH KHINDA, ET AL., 15 Defendants. 16 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS AMARJIT SINGH KHINDA AND HARDEV KHINDA, individually and d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS AND TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS, INC., an unknown business entity, d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. 19 and Defendants AMARJIT SINGH KHINDA AND HARDEV KHINDA, INDIVIDUALLY and 20 21 d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS AND TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS, INC., an unknown business entity, d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed without prejudice against AMARJIT SINGH KHINDA AND HARDEV KHINDA, 22 INDIVIDUALLY and d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS AND TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS, INC., 23 an unknown business entity, d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS. 24 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a 25 26 27 28 motion to reopen this action by February 5, 2012, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice. /// /// /// STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 2:10-cv-02104-WBS-EFB PAGE 1 This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each Party 1 2 referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 3 4 Dated: January 11, 2012 /s/ Thomas P. Riley LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. By: Thomas P. Riley Attorneys for Plaintiff JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. Dated: 5 /s/ Bruce C. Piontkowski TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI, LLP By: Bruce C. Piontkowski, Esquire Attorney for Defendants AMARJIT SINGH KHINDA AND HARDEV KHINDA, individually and d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS and TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS, INC., an unknown business entity, d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED: 19 DATED: January 13, 2012 20 21 22 23 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 /// STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 2:10-cv-02104-WBS-EFB PAGE 2 1 PROOF OF SERVICE (SERVICE BY OVERNIGHT MAIL) 2 3 I declare that: 4 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, California. I am over the age of eighteen years 5 and not a party to the within cause; my business address is First Library Square, 1114 Fremont Avenue, 6 7 South Pasadena, California 91030. I am readily familiar with this law firm's practice for collection and processing of correspondence/documents for mail in the ordinary course of business. 8 9 On January 11, 2012, I served: 10 11 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS AMARJIT SINGH KHINDA AND HARDEV KHINDA, individually and d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS AND TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS, INC., an unknown business entity, d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS 12 13 14 On all parties referenced by enclosing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope with postage 15 16 prepaid and following ordinary business practices, said envelope was duly mailed and addressed to: 17 Mr. Bruce Piontkowski, Esquire TINGLEY PIONTKOWSKI, LLP 10 Almaden Blvd., Suite 430 San Jose, CA 95113 18 19 20 21 22 23 I declare under the penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on January 11, 2012, at South Pasadena, California. 24 25 Dated: January 11, 2012 26 /// 27 28 /// STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 2:10-cv-02104-WBS-EFB PAGE 3 /s/Maria Baird MARIA BAIRD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?