Louie v. Depner et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/21/2011 ORDERING that case 2:10-cv-2106 JAM KJN is related with member of cases 2:10-CV-2113 JAM KJN, 2:10-CV-2366 JAM KJN, 2:10-CV-2530 LKK EFB, 2:11-CV-0074 JAM EFB, 2:11-CV-0107 JAM CKD, 2:11-CV-0108 MCE EFB, 2:11-CV-0882 JAM EFB, 2:11-CV-0883 KJM GGH, 2:11-CV-0884 MCE JFM, 2:11-CV-0885 JAM GGH.(Duong, D)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

GEORGE S. LOUIE,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

v.
THOMAS DEPNER, et al.

14

Defendants.

15
16

G. SING LOUIE,
Plaintiff,

17
v.

18
19

DIALYSIS CLINIC, INC., ELENA
SADUR and LESLIE WOLF,

20

Defendants.

21
22

G. SING LOUIE,
Plaintiff,

23
v.

24
25

DIALYSIS CLINIC, INC., ELENA
SADUR, and LESLIE WOLF,

26

Defendants.

27
28

///
1

Case No. 2:10-CV-2106 JAM-KJN

NOTICE OF RELATED CASES

Case No. 2:10-cv-2113 LKK-KJN

Case No. 2:10-cv-2366 JAM-KJN

1

GEORGE S. LOUIE,

2

Plaintiff,

3
4
5

v.
CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL COUNCIL,
et al.,
Defendants.

6
7

GEORGE S. LOUIE,

8

Plaintiff,

9
10

v.
VOLVO-CALIFORNIA SWEDISH, et al.,

11

Defendants.

12
13

GEORGE S. LOUIE,
Plaintiff,

14
v.

15
16

KIM SPINELLA, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

GEORGE S. LOUIE,

19

Plaintiff,

20
21
22

v.
STOMER FAMILY 2000 REVOCABLE
TRUST, et al.,
Defendants.

23
24

///

25

////

26

////

27

////

28

///
2

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:10-cv-2530 LKK-EFB

Case No. 2:11-cv-0074 JAM-EFB

Case No. 2:11-cv-0107 JAM-CKD

Case No. 2:11-cv-0108 MCE-EFB

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

GEORGE S. LOUIE,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ADAM RAMIREZ dba RAMIREZ TOWING,
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
GEORGE S. LOUIE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
DON JOHNSON,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
GEORGE S. LOUIE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PRAFULBHAI & JYOTSANABEN PATEL dba )
HOTELPLAZA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
GEORGE S. LOUIE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
STOCKTON BLVD. STORE, LLC. dba
)
MINI STORE, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No. 2:011-cv-0882 JAM-EFB

Case No. 2:11-cv-0883 KJM-GGH PS

Case No. 2:11-cv-0884 MCE-JFM

Case No. 2:11-cv-0885 JAM-GGH

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these

26

actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal.

27

2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge

28

and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of
3

1

judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the

2

parties.

3

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under

4

Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are

5

assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation

6

of the actions is effected.

7

court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and

8

magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

9

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated

Under the regular practice of this

10

2:10-CV-2113-LKK-KJN, 2:10-CV-2530-LKK-EFB, 2:11-CV-0108-MCE-EFB,

11

2:11-CV-0883-KJM-GGH and 2:11-CV-0884-MCE-JFM be reassigned to

12

Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all

13

further proceedings, and any dates currently set in these

14

reassigned cases only are hereby VACATED.

15

numbers on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown

16

as 2:10-CV-2113-JAM-KJN, 2:10-CV-2530-JAM-KJN, 2:11-CV-0108-JAM-

17

KJN, 2:11-CV-0883-JAM-KJN and 2:11-CV-0884-JAM-KJN.

18

Henceforth, the case

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make

19

appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to

20

compensate for this reassignment.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 21, 2011

____________________________
JOHN A. MENDEZ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
4