Holland v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/18/10: HEARING as to 26 Motion for Recusal RESET for 12/15/2010 at 09:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. HEARING as to 15 Motion to Dismiss RESET for 12/16/2010 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PS) Holland v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. TD AMERITRADE, INC., Defendant. / Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the court is Plaintiff's motion for recusal of the undersigned in these proceedings (Doc. 26). The undersigned finds it appropriate to set the matter for hearing. Therefore, a hearing on Plaintiff's motion for recusal will be set for December 15, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., before the undersigned in Redding, California. Plaintiff also requests a new hearing date for the Defendants' pending motion to dismiss, currently set for hearing on December 1, 2010. As the undersigned finds it appropriate to consider the motion for recusal prior to hearing the motion to dismiss, this request will also be granted. The hearing on the motion to dismiss will be reset to December 16, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SCOTT HOLLAND, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-2110-GEB-CMK ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. at 9:00 a.m.; and 2. 2010, at 10:00 a.m. The hearing on the pending motion to dismiss is reset for December 16, A hearing on Plaintiff's motion for recusal is set for December 15, 2010, DATED: November 18, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?