Warren v. Uribe

Filing 82

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/4/2015 ORDERING respondent to file a response to petitioner's 75 Rule 60(b)(3) motion within 30 days; and petitioner may file a reply to respondent's response within 14 days of the filing of the response. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNY LYNN WARREN, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 v. No. 2:10-cv-2120-MCE-EFB P ORDER DOMINGO URIBE, JR., 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 30, 2013, the undersigned issued findings 19 and recommendations recommending that habeas relief be denied on all of petitioner’s claims. 20 Petitioner filed objections to those findings and recommendations on June 21, 2013. On August 21 26, 2013, the assigned district judge adopted the May 30, 2013 findings and recommendations, 22 habeas relief was denied, and judgment was entered. 23 On September 27, 2013, petitioner filed an appeal from the district court’s August 26, 24 2013 order. On May 30, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order denying 25 petitioner’s motion for a certificate of appealability and “all pending motions.” On August 28, 26 2014, petitioner filed a timely motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3). ECF No. 75. Good 27 cause appearing, respondent will be ordered to file a response to petitioner’s Rule 60(b)(3) motion 28 within thirty days. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Respondent shall file a response to petitioner’s August 28, 2014 Rule 60(b)(3) motion 3 4 within thirty days from the date of this order. 2. Petitioner may file a reply to respondent’s response within fourteen days of the filing 5 of the response. 6 DATED: March 4, 2015. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?