Wichelman et al v. Santa Clara County California et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/01/11 ORDERING that the 7 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; plfs' Objections to the 6 F&Rs are due w/i 30 days. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

KARL WICHELMAN, et al.,

11

Plaintiffs,

12
13

No. CIV S-10-2125 KJM DAD PS

vs.
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CALIFORNIA, et al.,

ORDER

14
Defendants.
15

/

16

Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se in this action, have filed a document with the

17

court titled “Plaintiff’s [sic] Notification of Object [sic] to Order of Reassignment of Removal

18

form [sic] the Eastern District (Sacramento) to the Northern District (San Jose); Request for

19

Extension of Time to Make Formal Objections.” The court has not issued an order reassigning

20

or removing this action to another district. In the interests of justice, the court will grant

21

plaintiffs’ request for an extension of time to file their objections.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

23

1. Plaintiffs’ May 24, 2011 motion for extension of time to file objections (Doc.

24

No. 7) is granted; and

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

2. Plaintiffs’ objections to the findings and recommendations filed by the

2

undersigned on May 10, 2011 (Doc. No. 6) shall be filed within 30 days from the date this order

3

is signed; no further extension of time will be granted for this purpose.

4

DATED: June 1, 2011.

5
6
7
8

DAD:kw
Ddad1\orders.pro se\wichelman2125.ord.eot.objs

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2