Lau v. Pylman et al

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/8/2012. Pursuant to parties' agreement, an Early Telephonic Settlement Conference is SET for 6/28/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD). Parties shall submit brief Settlement Conference Statement by close of business on 6/26/2012. Court will STAY setting date for plaintiff to elect to file Second Amended Complaint and for defendant to file an Answer after 6/28/2012 Conference Hearing. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HUMPHREY LAU, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:10-cv-2129 MCE DAD PS v. KATHI PYLMAN, et al, Defendants. ORDER / This matter came before the court on June 8, 2012, for Status (Pretrial 17 Scheduling) Conference. Plaintiff Humphrey Lau, who is proceeding pro se in this action, 18 appeared telephonically on his own behalf. Attorney Brent Kramer appeared telephonically for 19 defendants Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Homesteps. 20 For the reasons stated on the record during the hearing, IT IS ORDERED that: 21 1. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement in open court, an Early Telephonic 22 23 24 25 26 Settlement Conference is set for Thursday, June 28, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.; 2. The parties shall appear at the settlement conference telephonically at the telephone numbers provided in open court; 3. The parties shall submit brief settlement conference statements addressing their respective settlement positions by close of business on June 26, 2012. Plaintiff’s statement shall 1 1 address what he can document with respect to his claim for damages; and 2 4. The court will stay setting dates for plaintiff to elect to file a second amended 3 complaint and for defendant to file an answer until after the June 28, 2012 Early Telephonic 4 Settlement Conference. 5 DATED: June 8, 2012. 6 7 8 9 10 DAD:6 orders.pro se/lau2129.060812 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?