Lau v. Pylman et al
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/8/2012. Pursuant to parties' agreement, an Early Telephonic Settlement Conference is SET for 6/28/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD). Parties shall submit brief Settlement Conference Statement by close of business on 6/26/2012. Court will STAY setting date for plaintiff to elect to file Second Amended Complaint and for defendant to file an Answer after 6/28/2012 Conference Hearing. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
HUMPHREY LAU,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:10-cv-2129 MCE DAD PS
v.
KATHI PYLMAN, et al,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
This matter came before the court on June 8, 2012, for Status (Pretrial
17
Scheduling) Conference. Plaintiff Humphrey Lau, who is proceeding pro se in this action,
18
appeared telephonically on his own behalf. Attorney Brent Kramer appeared telephonically for
19
defendants Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Homesteps.
20
For the reasons stated on the record during the hearing, IT IS ORDERED that:
21
1. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement in open court, an Early Telephonic
22
23
24
25
26
Settlement Conference is set for Thursday, June 28, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.;
2. The parties shall appear at the settlement conference telephonically at the
telephone numbers provided in open court;
3. The parties shall submit brief settlement conference statements addressing their
respective settlement positions by close of business on June 26, 2012. Plaintiff’s statement shall
1
1
address what he can document with respect to his claim for damages; and
2
4. The court will stay setting dates for plaintiff to elect to file a second amended
3
complaint and for defendant to file an answer until after the June 28, 2012 Early Telephonic
4
Settlement Conference.
5
DATED: June 8, 2012.
6
7
8
9
10
DAD:6
orders.pro se/lau2129.060812
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?