Lau v. Pylman et al

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/29/12 ORDERING that within 21 days plaintiff shall file a Ssecond Amended Complaint or a Notice of his Intention to proceed on his first amended complaint; defendants have 21 days from the date of plaintiff's filing to file an answer or a responsive pleading. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

HUMPHREY LAU,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

Case No. 2:10-cv-2129 MCE DAD PS

v.
KATHI PYLMAN, et al,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

This matter came before the court on June 28, 2012, for an Early Telephonic

17

Settlement Conference. Plaintiff Humphrey Lau, who is proceeding pro se in this action,

18

appeared telephonically on his own behalf. Attorney Brent Kramer appeared telephonically for

19

defendants Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Homesteps. The settlement

20

conference was held and the matter did not settle.

21

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

22

1. Within 21 days of the date of this order plaintiff shall file a second amended

23

complaint or a notice of his intention to proceed on his first amended complaint; and

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

2. Defendants shall have 21 days from the date of plaintiff’s filing to file an

2

answer or a responsive pleading.1

3

DATED: June 29, 2012.

4
5
6
7
8

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.pro se\lau2129.oah.062812

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

1

If plaintiff elects to proceed on the remaining claims set forth in his first amended
complaint, defendants will have 21 days from the date of service of that notice to file an answer
to the first amended complaint. If, however, plaintiff elects to file a second amended complaint,
defendants will have 21 days from the date of its filing to file an answer or other responsive
pleading to the second amended complaint.
2