Lau v. Pylman et al
Filing
49
JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/21/12 ORDERING that the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 47 shall be CONTINUED to 10/26/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and served by Plaintiff by 10/12/12. Any Reply to the Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and served by Defendants by 10/19/12. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
8
HUMPHREY LAU
Case No.: 2:10-cv-02129-MCE-DAD
9
Plaintiff
10
vs.
ORDER ON JOINT
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING DATE ON MOTION
TO DISMISS
11
12
13
14
Kathi Pylman, Henry O. Currie, Laurie
Mattos, Vitek Mortgage Group, Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation,
HomeSteps, Avalar Mistro Realty Group,
William L. Lyon & Associates, AKA
Lyon Real Estate and DOE I-XX,
Inclusive
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
The Court considered the Joint Stipulation to Continue Hearing on the
Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff, Humphrey Lau, and Defendants, Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Homesteps, and Orders:
ORDER ON
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to
October 26, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.
2. Any Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and served by
Plaintiff by October 12, 2012.
3. Any Reply to the Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and served by
Defendants by October 19, 2012.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: August 21, 2012
9
10
11
12
13
Ddad1\orders.prose\lau2129.stip.cont.ord
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER ON
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?