Lau v. Pylman et al

Filing 49

JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/21/12 ORDERING that the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 47 shall be CONTINUED to 10/26/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and served by Plaintiff by 10/12/12. Any Reply to the Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and served by Defendants by 10/19/12. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 8 HUMPHREY LAU Case No.: 2:10-cv-02129-MCE-DAD 9 Plaintiff 10 vs. ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO DISMISS 11 12 13 14 Kathi Pylman, Henry O. Currie, Laurie Mattos, Vitek Mortgage Group, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, HomeSteps, Avalar Mistro Realty Group, William L. Lyon & Associates, AKA Lyon Real Estate and DOE I-XX, Inclusive 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: The Court considered the Joint Stipulation to Continue Hearing on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff, Humphrey Lau, and Defendants, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Homesteps, and Orders: ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to October 26, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. 2. Any Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and served by Plaintiff by October 12, 2012. 3. Any Reply to the Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and served by Defendants by October 19, 2012. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: August 21, 2012 9 10 11 12 13 Ddad1\orders.prose\lau2129.stip.cont.ord 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?