Beliso v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/30/10 ORDERING that the 10/7/10 and 10/21/10 hearings on the motions to dismiss are VACATED; dft T.D. Service Company's 4 Motion to Dismiss is SUBMITTED on the record; dft Wells Fargo's 5 Motion to Dismiss will be submitted on the record after the time has passed for pltf to file an opposition and the dft to file a reply. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
(PS) Beliso v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. dba as AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. / Defendant T.D. Service Company's motion to dismiss presently is calendared for hearing on October 7, 2010. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank's motion to dismiss, or for more definite statement, is calendared for October 21, 2010. Having reviewed the record, the court has determined that oral argument would not be of material assistance in determining the pending motions. Accordingly, the court will not entertain oral argument, and will determine the motions on the record, including the briefing in support of and in opposition to the pending motions. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(h). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The October 7 and 21, 2010 hearings on the motions to dismiss, filed August 30 and September 10, 2010, are vacated; and \\\\\ \\\\\ 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHANDRA M. BELISO, Plaintiff, vs. No. CIV S-10-2131 JAM GGH PS ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2. The motions are submitted on the record.1 DATED: September 30, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE G G H : 0 7 6 : B e li s o 2 1 3 1 . v a c . w p d Wells Fargo Bank's motion will be submitted after the time has passed for plaintiff to file her opposition and for defendant to file a reply. 2 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?