Davis v. Walker et al

Filing 218

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/6/2017 ORDERING Defendants shall forthwith take all necessary steps to tender payment of the attached invoice to Dr. Mannis; Dr. Mannis shall submit any future bill for services directly to defendants by mailing a copy to counsel for defendants; and if defendants fail to timely pay any bill, Dr. Mannis may seek this court's assistance. (Attachments: # 1 Medical Record Review Billing)(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNARD LEE DAVIS, 12 13 14 No. 2:08-cv-0593 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. JAMES WALKER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 KENNARD LEE DAVIS, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 No. 2:10-cv-2139 KJM DB P v. ORDER JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants. 22 23 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis with civil rights actions 24 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 12, 2017, the court appointed Steven Hugh Mannis, M.D. 25 as a neutral expert to assist the court under Federal Rule of Evidence 706. ECF No. 154 at 6. 26 The order apportions the cost of Dr. Mannis’s services to be split equally among defendants. Id. 27 Dr. Mannis has submitted an invoice for the cost of medical record review, a copy of which is 28 1 1 attached to this order. The court anticipates Dr. Mannis will incur additional costs in connection 2 with the physical examination of plaintiff. 3 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Defendants shall forthwith take all necessary steps to tender payment of the 5 attached invoice to Dr. Mannis; 6 7 2. Dr. Mannis shall submit any future bill for services directly to defendants by mailing a copy to counsel for defendants; and 8 9 10 3. If defendants fail to timely pay any bill, Dr. Mannis may seek this court’s assistance. DATED: November 6, 2017. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?