Doug Duin v. Dale Elaine McCormick, et al

Filing 51

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/1/2011 DENYING 42 and 43 Motions to Strike; Erroneous provision detailed in 29 Scheduling Order is STRICKEN. (Michel, G)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

DOUGLAS C. DUIN,
Plaintiff,

7
v.

8

10

DALE ELAINE McCORMICK; ESTATE OF
ROBERT A. McCORMICK, Deceased;
JOHN G. STEFFES,

11

Defendants.
________________________________

9

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:10-cv-02150-GEB-EFB
ORDER

12
Plaintiff

13

moves

to

strike

one

of

Defendant

Dale

Elaine

14

McCormick’s expert disclosures, and two of Defendant John G. Steffes’s

15

expert disclosures, arguing those disclosures do not comply with the

16

requirements prescribed in the Court’s January 11, 2011 Scheduling

17

Order. However, review of the January 11, 2011 Scheduling Order’s expert

18

disclosure

19

provision erroneously refers to a non-existing Federal Rule of Civil

20

Procedure.

21

to strike are denied.

22

Dated:

provision

on

which

Plaintiff

relies

reveals

25

the

Therefore, that provision stricken, and Plaintiff’s motions

September 1, 2011

23
24

that

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

26
27
28
1