Merino et al v. El Dorado Hills County Water District
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/29/2012 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
DAVID MERINO; STEVE
MARANVILLE; KARA MERINO;
BRENDA MARANVILLE,
No. 2:10-CV-02152-LKK-DAD
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiffs,
12
13
vs.
14
EL DORADO HILLS COUNTY
WATER DISTRICT; and DOES 1-50,
[Filed Concurrently With:
Stipulation for Dismissal]
15
Defendants.
16
17
The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, have stipulated to a dismissal
18
of the entire action, as to each and every party, with prejudice
19
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice, in its
21
entirety, pursuant to stipulation of the parties and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
22
Procedure 41(a)(1).
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
DATED: November 29, 2012
26
27
28
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Order for Dismissal of Case With Prejudice
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?