Nelson v. Dickinsen et al
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 07/06/12 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration pursuant to 46 Objection/Motion for Reconsideration, the 43 04/19/12 Order of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DYKE EDWARD NELSON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:10-cv-2156 MCE JFM (PC)
vs.
DR. ALEX ZIGA, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to
17
42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 3, 2012, plaintiff filed a document styled as objections to the
18
magistrate judge’s order filed April 19, 2012, denying plaintiff’s April 9, 2012 motion for an
19
extension of time to conduct discovery in this action. The Court construes this as a request for
20
reconsideration of that order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders
21
shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the
22
Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or
23
contrary to law.
24
/////
25
/////
26
/////
1
1
2
3
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of
the magistrate judge filed April 19, 2012 (ECF No. 43), is AFFIRMED.
Dated: July 6, 2012
4
5
6
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?