Nelson v. Dickinsen et al

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 07/06/12 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration pursuant to 46 Objection/Motion for Reconsideration, the 43 04/19/12 Order of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYKE EDWARD NELSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:10-cv-2156 MCE JFM (PC) vs. DR. ALEX ZIGA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 17 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 3, 2012, plaintiff filed a document styled as objections to the 18 magistrate judge’s order filed April 19, 2012, denying plaintiff’s April 9, 2012 motion for an 19 extension of time to conduct discovery in this action. The Court construes this as a request for 20 reconsideration of that order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders 21 shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the 22 Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or 23 contrary to law. 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 1 2 3 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed April 19, 2012 (ECF No. 43), is AFFIRMED. Dated: July 6, 2012 4 5 6 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?