Nelson v. Dickinsen et al
Filing
79
ORDER adopting 72 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and denying 69 Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/12/13. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
DYKE EDWARD NELSON,
11
12
13
No. 2:10-CV-02156 MCE JFM P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
DR. ALEX ZIGA,
14
Defendant.
15
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
18
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On August 16, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein
20
which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
21
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 72.) Plaintiff
22
filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 77) and Defendants filed a reply
23
(ECF No. 78).
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, the
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1
1
2
3
4
5
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 16, 2013 (ECF No. 72), are
ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2. Plaintiff’s May 9, 2013, Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (ECF No. 69) is
DENIED.
Dated: November 12, 2013
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?