United States of America v. Approximately $7, 960.00 in U.S. Currency et al
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/7/2012 ORDERING that the United States' 34 Motion to Strike is GRANTED. The Claims of Jamarus Smith and Monique Banks are STRICKEN for failing to comply with Rule G(5) and/or pursuant to Rule G(8)(c)(i)(A)-(B) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions because said claimants lacks standing. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
13
14
No. 2:10-CV-02167-MCE-KJN
Plaintiff,
ORDER STRIKING CLAIMS OF
JAMARUS SMITH AND MONIQUE
BANKS PURSUANT TO RULE
G(8)(c) OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL
RULES FOR ADMIRALTY OR
MARITIME
AND ASSET
FORFEITURE ACTIONS
v.
15
APPROXIMATELY $7,960.00 IN U.S.
CURRENCY,
16
APPROXIMATELY $2,260.00 IN U.S.
CURRENCY,
17
18
APPROXIMATELY $3,195.00 IN U.S.
CURRENCY,
19
APPROXIMATELY $3,927.00 IN U.S.
CURRENCY, and
20
21
22
2007 CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT,
3GYFK62837G222266, LICENSE
NUMBER 8W03721,
VIN:
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
Presently before the Court is the United States’ Motion to
27
Strike the Claims of Jamarus Smith and Monique Banks pursuant to
28
Rule G(8)(c)(i)(A)-(B) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or
1
1
Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions (the “Supplemental
2
Rules”).
3
Smith or Banks.
4
good cause appearing therfor, the Court finds as follows:
5
1.
No opposition was made to the Motion on behalf of either
After having read and considered the motion, and
On October 6, 2011, the parties filed a joint status
6
report in the case.
7
specified that claimants Jamarus Smith and Monique Banks’ answers
8
would be filed no later than November 5, 2011.
9
2.
In the joint status report, the parties
Supplemental Rule G(5)(b) provides that a claimant must
10
file an answer or a Rule 12 motion within twenty-one days after
11
filing a claim.
12
12 motion, the United States may move to strike a claim or answer
13
"at any time before trial" for “failing to comply with Rule G(5)”
14
and/or “because the claimant lacks standing.”
15
Supp. G(8)(c)(i)(A)-(B).
16
3.
If the claimant does not file an answer or a Rule
Fed. R. Civ. P.
Statutory standing requires the claimant to comply with
17
certain procedural and statutory requirements.
18
39,557.00, More or Less, in U.S. Currency, 683 F. Supp. 2d 335,
19
338-39 (D.N.J. 2010).
20
understated, since the Answer provides the opportunity to present
21
defenses as to why a claimant has standing to contest the
22
forfeitability of the defendant property.
23
Board Feet and 11 Doors and Casings, No. 1:07cv1100-GBL, 2008 WL
24
839792 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2008).
25
strict compliance with the Supplemental Rules.
26
$487,825 in U.S. Currency, 484 F.3d 662, 664–65 (3d Cir. 2007).
27
///
28
///
United States v.
The importance of filing an Answer cannot be
2
United States v. 1866.75
Courts have held claimants to
United States v.
1
4.
To date, no Answers submitted by either Jamarus Smith or
2
Monique Banks have been filed, or have been served on counsel for
3
the United States.
4
accordingly GRANTED.1
5
ADJUDGED that the Claims of Jamarus Smith and Monique Banks in the
6
above-styled civil action are stricken for failing to comply with
7
Rule G(5) and/or pursuant to Rule G(8)(c)(i)(A)-(B) of the
8
Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset
9
Forfeiture Actions because said claimants lacks standing.
10
11
The United States’ Motion (ECF No. 34) is
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 7, 2012
12
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Having determined that oral argument was not of material
assistance, the Court submitted this matter on the briefs in
accordance with Eastern District Local Rule 230(g).
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?