Jones v. Cannedy et al

Filing 59

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/16/13 ORDERING that the dispositive motion deadline in this case shall be extended 75 days to July 10, 2013. Plaintiff shall be allowed to depose the Person Most Knowledgeable of the policy , practice or custom in place from January 19, 2010, through the summer of 2010 on B Facility at CSP Sacramento that subjected African- American inmates to a modified program. The time and date for this deposition shall be coordinated through counsel and subject to the mutual availability of the parties and/or deponent. All other dates in the Discovery and Scheduling Order will remain the same.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California MISHA D. IGRA, State Bar No. 208711 Supervising Deputy Attorney General DAVID E. BRICE, State Bar No. 269443 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 324-8010 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: David.Brice@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants Mini, Lizarraga and Virga 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 Case No. 2:10-CV-02174-KJM-KJN SHERMAN JONES, 13 14 STIPULATION TO MODIFY DISCOVERY Plaintiff, AND SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER v. 15 16 C. CANNEDY, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff SHERMAN JONES (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and defendants MINI, LIZARRAGA, 19 20 and VIRGA, (hereinafter “Defendants”) hereby present the following Stipulation to Modify the 21 Discovery and Scheduling Order in the above-captioned action. RECITALS 22 The parties set forth the following recitals to demonstrate that good cause exists to modify 23 24 the current discovery and scheduling order in this case: WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (hereinafter “FAC”) was filed on March 25 26 7, 2011. WHEREAS, on July 29, 2011, the Court deemed the FAC the operative pleading. 27 28 /// 1 Stipulation to Modify Discovery and Scheduling Order; [Proposed] Order (2:10-CV-02174-KJM-KJN) 1 2 WHEREAS, on February 24, 2012, attorneys Marguerite Meade and William L. Schmidt were substituted into this action as attorneys of record for Plaintiff. 3 4 WHEREAS, on September 24, 2012, the Court issued an order dismissing certain defendants and claims. (ECF No. 53.) 5 WHEREAS, on October 8, 2012, Defendants filed an answer to Plaintiff’s FAC. 6 WHEREAS, on October 18, 2012, the Court issued a scheduling order that deemed 7 discovery closed on February 1, 2013. 8 9 WHEREAS, Plaintiff was deposed on March 19, 2013, pursuant to stipulation of the parties. 10 WHEREAS, counsel for the parties met and conferred, stipulated to Plaintiff’s proposed 11 deposition of the person most knowledgeable regarding the policy, practice or custom in place 12 from January 19, 2010, through the summer of 2010 on B Facility at CSP – Sacramento that 13 subjected African-American inmates to a modified program, and scheduled the deposition for 14 April 3, 2013, at 10 a.m. 15 16 WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff had to cancel the April 3 deposition because of a family emergency. 17 18 WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have not yet been able determine a suitable new date to reschedule the April 3 deposition. 19 WHEREAS, the dispositive motion deadline in this case is April 26, 2013. 20 WHEREAS, counsel for the parties do not believe they will be able to reschedule and 21 conduct the April 3 deposition within a reasonable time before the dispositive motion deadline. 22 WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants has scheduled a four-week FMLA leave in May. 23 WHEREAS, no previous extension of the dispositive motion deadline has taken place. 24 STIPULATION 25 26 Now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys of record that: 27 28 1. The dispositive motion deadline in this case shall be extended 75 days to July 10, 2013. 2 Stipulation to Modify Discovery and Scheduling Order; [Proposed] Order (2:10-CV-02174-KJM-KJN) 1 2. Plaintiff shall be allowed to depose the Person Most Knowledgeable of the policy, 2 practice or custom in place from January 19, 2010, through the summer of 2010 on B Facility at 3 CSP – Sacramento that subjected African-American inmates to a modified program. The time 4 and date for this deposition shall be coordinated through counsel and subject to the mutual 5 availability of the parties and/or deponent. 6 3. All other dates in the Discovery and Scheduling Order will remain the same. 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 8 Date: April 15, 2013 LAW OFFICE OF MARGUERITE E. MEADE 9 By: /s/ Marguerite E. Meade________ Marguerite E. Meade Attorney for Plaintiff SHERMAN JONES 10 11 12 Dated: April 15, 2013 13 LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM L. SCHMIDT By: /s/ William L. Schmidt__________ William L. Schmidt Attorney for Plaintiff SHERMAN JONES 14 15 16 Dated: April 15, 2013 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California MISHA D. IGRA Supervising Deputy Attorney General 17 18 /s/ David E. Brice 19 DAVID E. BRICE Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Mini, Lizarraga and Virga 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Date: 4/16/2013 24 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 SA2010303600 31662837.doc 28 ad4mc0d 3 Stipulation to Modify Discovery and Scheduling Order; [Proposed] Order (2:10-CV-02174-KJM-KJN)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?