McCune v. Singh
Filing
58
AMENDED JUDGMENT re 51 MOTION for ATTORNEY FEES signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/19/13 ORDERING judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff Michael McCune and against Defendant Satnam Singh in the total amount of $55,177.73. (Meuleman, A)
LYNN HUBBARD III, SBN 69773
SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970
2 DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC
12 Williamsburg Lane
3 Chico, CA 95926
Telephone: (530) 895-3252
4 Facsimile: (530) 894-8244
Email: USDCEast@HubsLaw.com
1
5
6
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
8
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL McCUNE,
Case No. 2:10-cv-02207-JAM-GGH
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
AMENDED ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
vs.
15
SATNAM SINGH,
16
Defendant.
______________________________/
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Amended Entry of Judgment
McCune v. Satnam Singh
Case No. 2:10-cv-02207-JAM-GGH
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
On November 16, 2012, this Court granted Plaintiff Michael McCune’s
unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment and entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff
Michael McCune and against defendant Satnam Singh in the amount of $16,000.00.
Plaintiff Michael McCune’s unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees came
before the Court on April 15, 2013. The Court finds that Plaintiff is the prevailing
party within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §12205 and Cal. Civil Code § 55. The Court
also finds that the hourly rates, work performed, and costs incurred, as described in
Plaintiff’s moving papers are reasonable. Plaintiff’s Motion is therefore GRANTED
and Plaintiff is awarded $39,177.73 in attorney’s fees, litigation expenses and costs.
AMENDED JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff
Michael McCune and against Defendant Satnam Singh in the total amount of
$55,177.73.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated: April 19, 2013
/s/ John A. Mendez______________
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Amended Entry of Judgment
McCune v. Satnam Singh
Case No. 2:10-cv-02207-JAM-GGH
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?