McCune v. Singh

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/21/10 DENYING deft's 6 Motion for Stay and Early Evaluation Conference without prejudice. (Owen, K)

Download PDF
(PS) McCune v. Singh Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SATNAM SINGH, Defendant. / On September 16, 2010, defendant filed a document entitled, "application for stay and early evaluation conference per Civil Code 55.54." That document was not served on plaintiff. Defendant is advised that every document submitted to the court for consideration must be served on plaintiff. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. If an attorney has filed a document with the court on behalf of any plaintiff, then documents submitted by defendant must be served on that attorney and not on the plaintiff. Every document submitted conventionally to the court (e.g., by a pro se party) must include a certificate stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to plaintiff or his attorney and the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 135(b) and (c). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's September 16, 2010 application for stay and early evaluation conference, (dkt. no. 6), is denied without prejudice. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL MCCUNE, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-2207 FCD GGH PS ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 Defendant is cautioned that failure to properly serve any documents subsequently filed in this action, and failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may result in sanctions. DATED: September 21, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 GGH:076/McCune2207.pf.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?