Nelson et al v. Unum Group et al

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/23/2010 ORDERING that dfts shall have through 12/24/2010 to answer or otherwise to the complaint. (Zignago, K.)

Nelson et al v. Unum Group et al

Doc. 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. ANNA M. MARTIN - State Bar No. 154279 WILLIAM REILLY - State Bar No. 177550 1051 Divisadero Street San Francisco, California 94115 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] [e-mail]

Chambers Copy E-filed - 9/23/10 Case No. 2:10-cv-02222-JAM-KJM Honorable Judge John A. Mendez

Attorneys for Defendants UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY AND UNUM GROUP, INC. ERIC J. RATINOFF, SBN 166204 JOHN R. PARKER, JR. SBN 257761 KERSHAW CUTTER & RATINOFF LLP 401 Watt Avenue Sacramento, CA 95864 [phone] [phone] Facsimile MICHAEL HORROW, SBN 162917 Donahue & Horrow, LLP 1960 E. Grand Ave., Suite 1215 El Segundo, CA 90245 [phone] [phone] Facsimile Attorneys for RICHARD,NELSON and SANDRA NELSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD NELSON and SANDRA NELSON, Plaintiffs, vs. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; UNUM GROUP; PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants. ______________________________________

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02222-JAM-KJM STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 144(A)

-1STIPULATION RE PLEADINGS CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02222-JAM-KJM Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiffs RICHARD NELSON and SANDRA NELSON and defendants UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; UNUM GROUP; PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, through their respective counsel of record that defendants shall have through and including December 24, 2010 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS for this continuance as the parties have agreed to complete a mediation with Robert Kaplan on December 8, 2010, the first available date for all parties and the mediator. The parties wish to defer all legal costs in the hopes that they can settle the issues raised herein at the December 8, 2010 mediation

RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. DATED: September 23, 2010 By: /S/ WILLIAM REILLY WILLIAM REILLY Attorneys for Defendants UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; UNUM GROUP; PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY DONAHUE & HORROW, LLP DATED: September 23, 2010 By: /S/ MICHAEL HORROW MICHAEL HORROW Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 23, 2010.

/s/ John A. Mendez The Honorable John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2STIPULATION RE PLEADINGS CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02222-JAM-KJM