Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/21/2013 ORDERING 13 it is therefore appropriate to REOPEN this case in order to resolve the Court's sentence-six jurisdiction. Upon reopening, the parties stipulate that judgment should be entered for plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED Judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff. CASE REOPENED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 7 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney GRACE M. KIM Regional Chief Counsel DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8926 Facsimile: (415) 977-8873 8 Attorneys for Defendant 2 3 4 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 JAMES MARTIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) 1 ) Defendant. _____________________________________ ) CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02226-GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REOPEN AND ENTER JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF 19 The parties hereby stipulate, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval 20 of the Court, that this case shall be reopened for the purpose of entering judgment for Plaintiff. On March 30, 2011, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this Court remanded the 21 22 instant case to the Commissioner for a new hearing. Certain exhibits were missing from the 23 record, which made meaningful review of the case impossible. On February 8, 2012, an 24 25 26 27 28 1 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 1 - Stipulation & Order to Reopen and Enter Judgment for Plaintiff 1 administrative law judge (ALJ) issued a fully favorable decision in Plaintiff’s case (see 2 Exhibit 1). 3 Now that the administrative proceedings have concluded, reopening is necessary. In a 4 sentence-six remand case, the Court retains jurisdiction following the remand. See Melkonyan v. 5 Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98 (1991) (district court retains jurisdiction over Social Security cases 6 remanded under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence six, and where the final administrative decision is 7 favorable to one party or the other, the Commissioner is to return to the court following 8 completion of the administrative proceedings on remand so that the court may enter a final 9 judgment); see also Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 298-300 (1993). 10 11 12 13 [A] sentence six remand, because of clear language in the social security statute, implies and necessarily involves a reservation of jurisdiction for the future and contemplates further proceedings in the district court and a final judgment at the conclusion thereof. A sentence six remand judgment, the Court said, is therefore always interlocutory and never a “final” judgment. Carrol v. Sullivan, 802 F.Supp. 295, 300 (C. D. Cal. 1992) (paraphrasing and quoting 14 Melkonyan). 15 It is therefore appropriate to reopen this case in order to resolve the Court’s sentence- 16 six jurisdiction. Upon reopening, the parties stipulate that judgment should be entered for 17 Plaintiff. 18 19 Respectfully submitted, Dated: May 6, 2013 20 21 /s/ Bess Brewer (As authorized via email) BESS BREWER Attorney for Plaintiff 22 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 23 24 25 26 Dated: May 6, 2013 By /s/ Daniel P. Talbert DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant U. S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 27 28 2 - Stipulation & Order to Reopen and Enter Judgment for Plaintiff 1 2 3 4 ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered. Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff. Dated: November 21, 2013 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 5 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 GGH:076/Martin2226.jdmt 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 - Stipulation & Order to Reopen and Enter Judgment for Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?