Bryan v. Defense Technology U.S. et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/21/10 ORDERING that pltf shall submit, within 21 days, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP. Clerk directed to send pltf a new IFP from for a prisoner. (Owen, K)

Download PDF
(PS) Bryan v. Defense Technology U.S. et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff has filed a document requesting that the U.S. Marshal serve process on defendant Defense Technology U.S. Plaintiff is informed that if he seeks service by the U.S. Marshal, he must first qualify for in forma pauperis status by completing an application and filing it with the appropriate affidavit. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall submit, within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of defendant Defense Technology U.S.; and \\\\\ \\\\\ 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA T. TERELL BRYAN, Plaintiff, vs. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY U.S.; et al., Defendants. / ORDER CIV. NO. S-10-2241 MCE GGH PS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. DATED: September 21, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE G G H :0 7 6 :B r ya n 2 2 4 1 .ifp .w p d 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?