Bryan v. Defense Technology U.S. et al
Filing
59
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/16/11 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 2/10/11, are adopted in full; and the motion to dismiss, brought by defendants United States Attorney of Sacramento and United States of America 8 is granted, and these defendants are dismissed with prejudice. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
T. TERREL BRYAN,
Plaintiff,
11
No. CIV S-10-2241 KJM GGH P
vs.
12
13
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY U.S., et al.,
14
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
16
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On February 10, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations1 and defendants have filed a response.
23
/////
24
1
25
26
In his objections, plaintiff asks the court to provide to him certain cases he contends he
has not been able to obtain from the prison library. (Pl.’s Obj. at 18, ECF 52.) It is not the
court’s place to conduct legal research for plaintiff. The court has taken account of the cases
plaintiff references in issuing this order.
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule
2
304, the court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file,
3
the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the
4
proper analysis.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 10, 2011, are adopted in
7
full; and
8
9
2. The motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), brought
by defendants United States Attorney of Sacramento and United States of America and filed on
10
August 27, 2010 (docket # 8), is granted, and these defendants are dismissed with prejudice.
11
DATED: August 16, 2011.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
/brya2241.805
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?