Fisher v. Bryant et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/2/12 ORDERING that, within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment/ motion for summary adjudication and shall SHOW CAUSE in writing w hy sanctions should not be imposed for the failure to file a timely opposition. In the alternative, if petitioner no longer wishes to proceed with this matter, he shall file a request to dismiss this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JEFFERY L. FISHER,

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

No. CIV S-10-2311 KJM DAD P

BRYANT, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

On February 24, 2012, defendant Jason Bryant filed a motion for summary

17

judgment or in the alternative, summary adjudication. Plaintiff has not opposed that motion.

18

Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file an

19

opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to

20

the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.”

21

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within fourteen days of

22

the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment/

23

motion for summary adjudication and shall show cause in writing why sanctions should not be

24

imposed for the failure to file a timely opposition. In the alternative, if petitioner no longer

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

wishes to proceed with this matter, he shall file a request to dismiss this action without prejudice

2

pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

3

DATED: April 2, 2012.

4
5
6

DAD:4
fish2311.osc

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2