Fasugbe et al v. 1524948 Alberta LTD
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/3/11: HEARING as to 35 Motion to Dismiss and 34 Motion to Dismiss RESET for 5/23/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)
4
SEAN REIS - SBN 184004
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP
30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
Tel: (949) 459-2124
Fax: (949) 459-2123
sreis@edelson.com
5
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
1
2
3
6
11
KARL S. KRONENBERGER
VIRGINIA SANDERSON
KRONENBERGER BURGOYNE LLP
150 Post Street, Suite 520
San Francisco, California 94108
Tel: (415) 955-1155
Fax: (415) 955-1158
karl@kbinternetlaw.com
ginny@kbinternetlaw.com
12
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
7
8
9
10
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
OLUWASEUN FASUGBE and LUKE HUCKABA,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 10-cv-02320-WBS-KJN
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
TO DISMISS
1524948 ALBERTA LTD., a Canadian corporation
d/b/a TERRA MARKETING GROUP d/b/a
SWIPEBIDS.COM, SPHERE MEDIA, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company, JESSE WILLMS, and JOHN
DOE,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 10-CV-02320-WBS-KJN
1
This cause coming before the Court on the Parties’ Joint Stipulation Continuing Hearing on
2
Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, having considered the Parties’ stipulation and the Court being
3
otherwise duly advised in the premises,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
5
1.
The hearing on Defendants’ pending motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended
6
Class Action Complaint set for May 9, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. shall be continued to May 23, 2011 at 2:00
7
p.m.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 3, 2011
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
2
CASE NO. 10-CV-02320-WBS-KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?