Louie v. Dialysis Clinic, Inc.

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/21/2011 ORDERING that case 2:10-CV-2366 JAM KJN is related with member of cases 2:10-CV-2530 LKK EFB, 2:11-CV-0074 JAM EFB, 2:11-CV-0107 JAM CKD, 2:11-CV-0108 MCE EFB, 2:11-CV-0882 JAM EFB, 2:11-CV-0883 KJM GGH, 2:11-CV-0884 MCE JFM, 2:11-CV-0885 JAM GGH.(Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE S. LOUIE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) v. THOMAS DEPNER, et al. 14 Defendants. 15 16 G. SING LOUIE, Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 19 DIALYSIS CLINIC, INC., ELENA SADUR and LESLIE WOLF, 20 Defendants. 21 22 G. SING LOUIE, Plaintiff, 23 v. 24 25 DIALYSIS CLINIC, INC., ELENA SADUR, and LESLIE WOLF, 26 Defendants. 27 28 /// 1 Case No. 2:10-CV-2106 JAM-KJN NOTICE OF RELATED CASES Case No. 2:10-cv-2113 LKK-KJN Case No. 2:10-cv-2366 JAM-KJN 1 GEORGE S. LOUIE, 2 Plaintiff, 3 4 5 v. CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL COUNCIL, et al., Defendants. 6 7 GEORGE S. LOUIE, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. VOLVO-CALIFORNIA SWEDISH, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 GEORGE S. LOUIE, Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 KIM SPINELLA, et al., Defendants. 17 18 GEORGE S. LOUIE, 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 22 v. STOMER FAMILY 2000 REVOCABLE TRUST, et al., Defendants. 23 24 /// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 /// 2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:10-cv-2530 LKK-EFB Case No. 2:11-cv-0074 JAM-EFB Case No. 2:11-cv-0107 JAM-CKD Case No. 2:11-cv-0108 MCE-EFB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 GEORGE S. LOUIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ADAM RAMIREZ dba RAMIREZ TOWING, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) GEORGE S. LOUIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DON JOHNSON, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) GEORGE S. LOUIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PRAFULBHAI & JYOTSANABEN PATEL dba ) HOTELPLAZA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) GEORGE S. LOUIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) STOCKTON BLVD. STORE, LLC. dba ) MINI STORE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 2:011-cv-0882 JAM-EFB Case No. 2:11-cv-0883 KJM-GGH PS Case No. 2:11-cv-0884 MCE-JFM Case No. 2:11-cv-0885 JAM-GGH Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these 26 actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 27 2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge 28 and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of 3 1 judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the 2 parties. 3 The parties should be aware that relating the cases under 4 Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are 5 assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation 6 of the actions is effected. 7 court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and 8 magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. 9 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated Under the regular practice of this 10 2:10-CV-2113-LKK-KJN, 2:10-CV-2530-LKK-EFB, 2:11-CV-0108-MCE-EFB, 11 2:11-CV-0883-KJM-GGH and 2:11-CV-0884-MCE-JFM be reassigned to 12 Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all 13 further proceedings, and any dates currently set in these 14 reassigned cases only are hereby VACATED. 15 numbers on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown 16 as 2:10-CV-2113-JAM-KJN, 2:10-CV-2530-JAM-KJN, 2:11-CV-0108-JAM- 17 KJN, 2:11-CV-0883-JAM-KJN and 2:11-CV-0884-JAM-KJN. 18 Henceforth, the case IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make 19 appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to 20 compensate for this reassignment. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 21, 2011 ____________________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?