Jackson v. Salinas et al

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/5/2011 ORDERING 20 Within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition; failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action be pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIDEL JACKSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:10-cv-2370 KJN (TEMP) P SALINAS, et al. 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 On May 16, 2011, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has not opposed 17 the motion. Local Rule 230(c) requires a party to file an opposition or statement of non- 18 opposition in response to a motion. Failure to oppose a motion to dismiss may be deemed a 19 failure by plaintiff to prosecute his case and result in dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil 20 Procedure 41(b). Therefore plaintiff will have a final opportunity in which to file an opposition 21 or statement of non-opposition. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. Within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to 24 the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 result in dismissal of this action be pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 2 DATED: July 5, 2011 3 4 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 step1516.46osc 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?