Alvarez v. T-Mobile USA, Inc
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/29/11 GRANTING plaintiff's unopposed ex parte application for expedited hearing on 30 Motion for Leave to conduct Arbitration-Related Discovery; The Motion will be heard on 7/5/2011 at 03:30 PM in Co urtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. Both sides may appear by telephone. Arguments will be limited to ten minutes per side. The Clerk will initiate an email to counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephonic hearing. (Matson, R)
1
2
3
4
Jenelle Welling (State Bar No. 209480)
Nicole D. Reynolds (State Bar No. 246255)
GREEN WELLING, P.C.
595 Market Street, Suite 2750
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 477-6700
Facsimile: (415) 477-6710
Email: caed.uscourts@classcounsel.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
TRENT ALVAREZ, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly
situated
Case No.: 2:10-cv-02373-WBS-GGH
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED EX
Plaintiff,
PARTE APPLICATION FOR
EXPEDITED HEARING ON
vs.
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
CONDUCT ARBITRATIONT-MOBILE USA, INC., and DOES RELATED DISCOVERY
1-10,
Defendants.
Hon. William B. Shubb
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
For good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s Unopposed Ex Parte Application for
Expedited Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Conduct Arbitration-Related
Discovery is GRANTED. The motion, and any opposition thereto, may be made
orally, and will be heard at 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, July 5, 2011. Both sides may
appear by telephone. Arguments will be limited to ten minutes per side. The
Clerk will initiate an email to counsel with instructions on how to participate in
the telephonic hearing.
Dated: June 29, 2011
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLF’S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APP. RE: EXPEDITED HRG
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02373-WBS-GGH
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?