Hoffman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/05/2011 ORDERING that Response to the 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is due by 8/1/2011. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
CYNTHIA B. DE NARDI, CSBN 256770
Special Assistant United States Attorney
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

7
Attorneys for Defendant
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

VALENTINA PERALTA HOFFMAN, )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)

Case No. 2:10-cv-2377-DAD
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
A FIRST EXTENSION OF 30 DAYS
FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17
18

The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, with the Court’s approval as

19

indicated by issuance of the attached Order, that Defendant shall have a first

20

extension of time of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary

21

judgment.

22

The undersigned requires additional time in order to respond to Plaintiff’s

23

arguments because her briefing schedule was impacted by four time-sensitive

24

employment litigation tasks assigned yesterday. The current date is June 30, 2011.

25

The new due date will be August 1, 2010.

26
27
28

-1-

1
2

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be
modified accordingly.
Respectfully submitted,

3
4
5

Date: June 27, 2011

6
7

/s/ *Richard Allen Whitaker
RICHARD ALLEN WHITAKER
(by telephone authorization 6/24/11)
Law Office of Richard Whitaker
Attorney for Plaintiff

8
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

9
10
11
12

/s/ Cynthia B. De Nardi
CYNTHIA B. DE NARDI

13

Attorneys for Defendant

14
15
16

ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is approved. Defendant’s time to respond to

17
18
19
20
21

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is extended to August 1, 2011, and the
scheduling order is modified accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 5, 2011

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ddad1\orders.socsec\hoffman2377.stipord.eot.dxmsj

-2-