Delgado v. CDCR Medical Health Care Department, et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/9/2010 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 are ADOPTED in FULL; and defendants Cardeno, K. Daly, Duk, Liamcar, Dave Russell, Sahoto, Val, Verga, J. Ball and CDCR Medical Health Care Department are DISMISSED without prejudice from this action. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Delgado v. CDCR Medical Health Care Department, et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 5, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: //// 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSEPH DELGADO, Plaintiff, vs. CDCR MEDICAL HEALTH CARE DEPARTMENT, et al., ORDER No. 2:10-cv-2379 MCE KJN P Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 5, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. Defendants CDCR Medical Health Care Department, Daly, Verga, Val, Duk, Liamcar, D. Russell, J. Ball, Sahuto and Cardeno are dismissed without prejudice from this action. Dated: December 9, 2010 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?