Treja v. Nangalama et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/4/11 GRANTING 16 Motion for Extension of time; Discovery due by 12/30/11; Pretrial motions due by 3/30/12.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JORGE TREJO,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. CIV S-10-2381 DAD P

vs.
NANGALAMA, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Defendants have filed a motion to modify the scheduling order in this case.

17

Specifically, defendants request an additional ninety days to complete discovery and file

18

dispositive motions. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

19

1. Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order (Doc. No. 16) is granted;

20

2. The parties may conduct discovery until December 30, 2011. Any motions

21

necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by that date. All requests for discovery pursuant to

22

Fed. R. Civ. P. 31, 33, 34 or 36 shall be served not later than sixty days prior to that date;

23

3. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or

24

before March 30, 2012. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of this court’s

25

order filed October 6, 2010; and

26

/////
1

1

4. Except as set forth in this order, the court’s June 15, 2011 discovery and

2

scheduling order remains in effect.

3

DATED: August 4, 2011.

4
5
6
7
8

DAD:9:md
trej2381.41mod

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2