Bel Air Mart et al v. Arnold Cleaners, Inc. et al
Filing
302
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/13/2015 CONFIRMING AND APPROVING the settlement agreements attached as Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Olivia M. Wright re 294 Motion for Good Faith Settlement Determination; DISMISSI NG WITH PREJUDICE all claims, counterclaims, and cross-claims asserted against Yolanda Panattoni, Ralph Armstrong, Robert Gern Nagler, Estate of Ronald G. Armstrong, Deceased, Han Hoi Joo, Chang Sun Joo and/or Peter Kim; DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE all claims, counterclaims, cross-claims, and third-party claims asserted by Yolanda Panattoni, Robert Gern Nagler, and Estate of Ronald G. Armstrong, Deceased against Bel Air Mart, Gene Wong, Paul Wong and/or Lillie Fong; DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE all c ross-claims made by Estate of John W. Burns, Deceased and Estate of Elice G. Burns, Deceased against Yolanda Panattoni, Ralph Armstrong, Robert Gern Nagler, Estate of Ronald G. Armstrong, Deceased, Han Hoi Joo, Chang Sun Joo and/or Peter Kim; ORDERIN G that the court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement between the settling parties as to (a) Paragraph 1 of the Partial Global Settlement with the Settling Parties' Joint Motion; and (b) Paragraph 1 of the Panatto ni Settlement Agreement, attached as Exhibit B to the Declaration of Olivia M. Wright re 294 Motion for Good Faith Settlement Determination; BARRING all claims relating to the facts of this action pursuant to Section 6 of the Uniform Comparative Fa ult Act, 12 U.L.A. 147 (1996), and Section 877.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; DENYING 295 Request to Set a Status Conference; ORDERING the parties to meet and confer and prepare and submit by 2/28/2015, a Joint Status Report that sets forth the parties' proposed scheduling for further proceedings. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BEL AIR MART, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 2:10-cv-02392-MCE-EFB
ORDER
v.
ARNOLD CLEANERS, INC., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
The Court has reviewed the Joint Motion for Good Faith Settlement Determination
17
18
(ECF No. 294), Bel Air Mart’s and Wong Family Investors, L.P.’s request to set a status
19
conference (ECF No. 295), and the Joint Stipulations and Statement of Non-Opposition
20
from the Estates of John W. Burns and Elice G. Burns (ECF Nos. 296-301). The Court
21
has determined that the agreements were made in good faith and are fair, reasonable,
22
and consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
23
Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., and California
24
Code of Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 877 and 877.6.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
2
1.
The settlement agreements between the Settling Parties,1 attached as
3
Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Olivia M. Wright (ECF No. 294-2), are confirmed
4
and approved;
5
2.
All claims, counterclaims, and cross-claims asserted in the above-entitled
6
action against Panattoni, Ralph Armstrong, Nagler, the Armstrong Estate, and/or the Joo
7
Parties are DISMISSED with prejudice;
8
9
10
11
3.
All claims, counterclaims, cross-claims, and third-party claims asserted in
the above-entitled action by Panattoni, Nagler and the Armstrong Estate against Bel Air,
WFI, and/or the Wongs are DISMISSED with prejudice;
4.
All cross-claims made by the Estate of John W. Burns and The Estate of
12
Elice G. Burns against Panattoni, Ralph Armstrong, Nagler, the Armstrong Estate and/or
13
the Joo Parties are DISMISSED with prejudice;
14
5.
The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the following terms of the
15
settlement agreements between the Settling Parties: (a) Paragraph 1 of the Partial
16
Global Settlement with the Settling Parties’ Joint Motion; and (b) Paragraph 1 of the
17
Panattoni Settlement Agreement, attached as Exhibit B to the Declaration of Olivia M.
18
Wright (ECF No. 294-2);
19
6.
All claims relating to the facts of this action, including but not limited to,
20
claims for contribution and indemnity that have been or could have been asserted by any
21
person or entity, in this action or otherwise, against Panattoni, Ralph Armstrong, Nagler,
22
the Armstrong Estate, or the Joo Parties with regard to the matters is in this action and
23
with regard to the dry cleaner site located at 4338 Arden Way, Sacramento, CA, whether
24
25
26
27
28
1
The Settling Parties include Bel Air Mart (“Bel Air”); Wong Family Investors, L.P. ("WFI"); Gene
Wong, Paul Wong, Lillie Fong (collectively, "Wongs"); Yolanda Panattoni ("Panattoni"); The Estate of
Ronald G. Armstrong, Deceased ("Armstrong Estate"), by and through its insurer Century
Indemnity Company, as successor to CCI Insurance Company, as successor to Insurance Company of
North America, pursuant to California Probate Code section 550 ("Century"); Ralph Armstrong; Robert
Gern Nagler, individually and as Trustee of the John W. Burns Testamentary Trust (collectively "Nagler");
and Arnold Cleaners, Inc., Han Hoi Joo, Chang Sun Joo, and Peter Kim (the "Joo Parties") (collectively,
the "Settling Parties"). The Estate of John W. Burns and The Estate of Elice G. Burns filed a later
Statement of Non-Opposition to the settlement agreement. See ECF No. 296.
2
1
such claims are or could be brought pursuant to federal or state law, are BARRED
2
pursuant to Section 6 of the Uniform Comparative Fault Act, 12 U.L.A. 147 (1996), and
3
Section 877.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and
4
7.
The request to set a status conference (ECF No. 295) is DENIED. Instead,
5
the remaining parties, if any, shall meet and confer and shall prepare and submit to the
6
Court a Joint Status Report by February 28, 2015, that sets forth the parties’ proposed
7
schedule for further proceedings.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 13, 2015
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?