Bel Air Mart et al v. Arnold Cleaners, Inc. et al

Filing 307

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/16/2015 ORDERING 297 that the cross-claim made by The Estate of John W. Burns and The Estate of Elice G. Burns against The Estate of Ronald G. Armstrong, Deceased, by and thr ough Century Indemnity Company as successor to CCI Insurance Company, as successor to Insurance Company of North America pursuant to Probate Code Sec 550 et seq. is DISMISSED and that each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EARL L. HAGSTRÖM (STATE BAR NO. 150958) earl.hagstrom@sedgwicklaw.com ALLISON M. LOW (STATE BAR NO. 273202) allison.low@sedgwicklaw.com SEDGWICK LLP 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104-2834 Telephone: 415.781.7900 Facsimile: 415.781.2635 Attorneys for Defendants and Cross-Claimants THE ESTATE OF JOHN W. BURNS AND THE ESTATE OF ELICE G. BURNS, BY AND THROUGH ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY PURSUANT TO PROBATE CODE § 550 et seq. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 BEL AIR MART, a California corporation and WONG FAMILY INVESTORS, L.P., Case No. 2:10-CV-02392 MCE-EFB 13 JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CROSS-CLAIM BY THE ESTATE OF JOHN W. BURNS AND THE ESTATE OF ELICE G. BURNS AS TO THE ESTATE OF RONALD G. ARMSTRONG, DECEASED, BY AND THROUGH CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY AS SUCCESSOR TO CCI INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR TO INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, PURSUANT TO PROBATE CODE § 550 ET SEQ.; AND Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 ARNOLD CLEANERS, INC.; et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 ORDER 21 22 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. 23 24 25 26 27 28 19749196v1 -1JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CROSS-CLAIM Case No. 2:10-CV-02392-MCE-EFB 1 Cross-Claimants The Estate of John W. Burns and The Estate of Elice G. Burns 2 (collectively the “Burns”) and Cross-Defendant The Estate of Ronald G. Armstrong, Deceased, 3 by and through Century Indemnity Company as successor to CCI Insurance Company, as 4 successor to Insurance Company of North America, pursuant to Probate Code § 550 et seq. 5 (collectively “Armstrong”), by and through their counsel of record, respectfully submit this 6 Joint Stipulation for Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, subsection 7 (a)(2). The parties agree that this Joint Stipulation disposes of the Burns’ cross-claim against 8 Armstrong and that each party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 9 DATED: January 7, 2015 10 By: _________/s/ Allison M. Low _ Allison M. Low Attorney for Defendants THE ESTATE OF JOHN W. BURNS AND THE ESTATE OF ELICE G. BURNS, BY AND THROUGH ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY PURSUANT TO PROBATE CODE § 550 et seq. 11 12 13 14 15 SEDGWICK LLP DATED: December 31, 2014 By: 16 17 18 19 20 21 BASSI, EDLIN, HUIE & BLUM LLP /s/ Farheena A. Habib [as authorized on December 31, 2014] Farheena A. Habib Attorney for Defendant and Cross-Defendant THE ESTATE OF RONALD G. ARMSTRONG, DECEASED, BY AND THROUGH CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY AS SUCCESSOR TO CCI INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR TO INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, PURSUANT TO PROBATE CODE § 550 et seq. ORDER 22 23 24 cross-claim made by The Estate of John W. Burns and The Estate of Elice G. Burns against The 25 Estate of Ronald G. Armstrong, Deceased, by and through Century Indemnity Company as 26 successor to CCI Insurance Company, as successor to Insurance Company of North America, 27 /// 28 19749196v1 Having reviewed the Joint Stipulation set forth above, the Court hereby orders that the /// -2JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CROSS-CLAIM Case No. 2:10-CV-02392-MCE-EFB 1 pursuant to Probate Code § 550 et seq. is dismissed and that each party shall bear their own 2 attorneys’ fees and costs. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 16, 2015 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19749196v1 -3JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CROSS-CLAIM Case No. 2:10-CV-02392-MCE-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?