Claiborne v. Blauser et al
Filing
104
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/9/2014 AFFIRMING 89 Order denying Motion to Appoint Counsel; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to terminate 91 Motion to file a supplemental pleading, 92 Motion for Reconsideration. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DENNIS G. CLAIBORNE
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
No. 2:10-cv-2427-LKK-EFB P
BLAUSER, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. On June 3, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff’s request
19
to have certain prison officials indicted. ECF No. 89. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of that
20
order. See ECF No. 91 (alleging that defendants and Attorney General’s Office committed
21
perjury and requesting that “the culprits [be] charged and arrested and/or disbarred”); ECF Nos.
22
92, 94 (same); ECF No. 93 (repeating allegations that defendants and Attorney General’s Office
23
committed perjury); see also ECF No. 95 (styled “ex parte motion, Providing the Senior Judge,
24
Lawrence K. Karlton, with Defendants’ Perjurious Discovery Documents, Under Penalty of
25
Perjury”).
26
Local Rule 303(f) provides that magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly
27
erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not
28
appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
1
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the
2
magistrate judge filed June 3, 2013, is affirmed and the Clerk of the Court shall terminate docket
3
numbers 91 and 92.
4
DATED: January 9, 2014.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?