Claiborne v. Blauser et al

Filing 104

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/9/2014 AFFIRMING 89 Order denying Motion to Appoint Counsel; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to terminate 91 Motion to file a supplemental pleading, 92 Motion for Reconsideration. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DENNIS G. CLAIBORNE

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

No. 2:10-cv-2427-LKK-EFB P

BLAUSER, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. On June 3, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff’s request

19

to have certain prison officials indicted. ECF No. 89. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of that

20

order. See ECF No. 91 (alleging that defendants and Attorney General’s Office committed

21

perjury and requesting that “the culprits [be] charged and arrested and/or disbarred”); ECF Nos.

22

92, 94 (same); ECF No. 93 (repeating allegations that defendants and Attorney General’s Office

23

committed perjury); see also ECF No. 95 (styled “ex parte motion, Providing the Senior Judge,

24

Lawrence K. Karlton, with Defendants’ Perjurious Discovery Documents, Under Penalty of

25

Perjury”).

26

Local Rule 303(f) provides that magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

27

erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

28

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

1

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

2

magistrate judge filed June 3, 2013, is affirmed and the Clerk of the Court shall terminate docket

3

numbers 91 and 92.

4

DATED: January 9, 2014.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2