Claiborne v. Blauser et al

Filing 156

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/21/15 DENYING 154 Motion for an order for the U.S. Marshal to serve subpoenas.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DENNIS GERALD CLAIBORNE, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:10-cv-2427 JAM EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. BLAUSER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The pretrial order in this action issued on March 21, 2014. ECF No. 114. That 19 order informed plaintiff that to obtain the presence at trial of any unincarcerated witness, plaintiff 20 must tender the daily witness fee and the witness’ travel expenses. Id. at 10. The order instructed 21 that “even a plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis must tender the fees” because “[n]o statute 22 authorizes the use of public funds” to cover these costs. Id. 23 Despite this admonition, plaintiff now requests an order for the U.S. Marshal to serve 24 subpoenas on his unincarcerated witnesses and to “advance the witness fees.” ECF No. 154. The 25 Ninth Circuit has held that the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, does not authorize the 26 expenditure of public funds to pay for witness fees and expenses. Tedder v. Odel, 890 F.2d 210, 27 211-12 (9th Cir. 1989); see also Dixon v. Ylst, 990 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, 28 plaintiff’s motion is denied. If plaintiff wishes to obtain the presence at trial of an unincarcerated 1 1 witness, he must follow the instructions provided in the pretrial order, including tendering 2 through the U.S. Marshal a money order payable to the witness in the amount of the daily witness 3 fee ($40.00) plus the witness’ travel expenses. 4 5 So ordered. DATED: May 21, 2015. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?