Claiborne v. Blauser et al

Filing 191

ORDER signed by District Judge Virginia A. Phillips on 11/18/2015 DENYING 189 Motion for Judgment. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL Case No. 2:10-CV-2427VAP Date: November 18, 2015 Title: DENNIS GERALD CLAIBORNE -v- BLAUSER, ET. AL. =============================================================== PRESENT: HONORABLE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Marva Dillard Courtroom Deputy ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: None Present Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None PROCEEDINGS: None MINUTE ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW (IN CHAMBERS) On October 29, 2015, Plaintiff Dennis Claiborne ("Plaintiff") filed a Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law ("Motion") under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b). (Doc. 189). Under Rule 50(b), a party may move for judgment as a matter of law, so long as he moved for judgment previously "at the close of all the evidence" and before "submission of the case to the jury." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a); Janes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 279 F.3d 883, 886-87 (9th Cir. 2002). Here, Plaintiff did not move for judgment as a matter of law "before the case [was] submitted to the jury." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a). Although he has previously moved for judgment as a matter of law (See Docs. 86, 175), he did so well before trial and before the "close of all the evidence." See Janes, 279 F.3d at 887. The MINUTES FORM 11 CIVIL -- GEN Initials of Deputy Clerk __md___ Page 1 EDCV 10-02427 VAP DENNIS GERALD CLAIBORNE V. BLAUSER, ET. AL. MINUTE ORDER of November 18, 2015 Court has also considered Plaintiff's Motion on the merits and finds that he is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Rule 50(b) Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. MINUTES FORM 11 CIVIL -- GEN Initials of Deputy Clerk __md___ Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?