Hernandez v. Bouwman et al

Filing 61

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/29/12 denying 50 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted 21 days to serve his responses to defendant McDaniels' outstanding requests for discovery. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALVARO HERNANDEZ, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:10-cv-2446 LKK CKD P vs. K. BOUWMAN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 On May, 2, 2012, defendant McDaniels filed a motion asking that this matter be 17 dismissed because plaintiff has not served responses to requests for discovery as he was ordered 18 to do in this court’s April 3, 2012 order. In his opposition, plaintiff asserts he filed the responses 19 with the court rather than serving them on counsel for defendant McDaniels. Good cause 20 appearing, plaintiff will be given an additional 21 days to serve his responses on counsel for 21 defendant McDaniels and defendant McDaniels’ motion to dismiss will be denied. The court 22 notes, however, that this is not the first time plaintiff has misunderstood or misinterpreted court 23 orders or rules. See April 3, 2012 Order. In the future, plaintiff must take better care to comply 24 with court orders and rules or the court may issue sanctions. 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Defendant McDaniels’ May 2, 2012 motion to dismiss is denied. 3 2. Plaintiff is granted 21 days to serve his responses to defendant McDaniels’ 4 5 outstanding requests for discovery. Dated: May 29, 2012 6 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 1 hern2446.mtd 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?