O'Brien v. McEwen
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/20/17 GRANTING 78 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Scott L. Tedmon terminated. The record shall reflect that co-counsel David A. Nickerson continues to represent petitioner Sean Alan OBrien in this case.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT L. TEDMON
A Professional Corporation
SCOTT L. TEDMON, CA. BAR # 96171
980 Ninth Street, 16th Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 449-9985
Facsimile: (916) 446-7104
Email: tedmonlaw@comcast.net
Attorney for Petitioner
SEAN ALAN O’BRIEN
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
SEAN ALAN O’BRIEN,
13
Petitioner,
14
15
16
17
vs.
LELAND McEWEN,
Respondent.
18
19
20
21
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-2472 MCE CKD P
SCOTT L. TEDMON’S MOTION TO
WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF
RECORD FOR PETITIONER SEAN
ALAN O’BRIEN; ORDER
I, Scott L. Tedmon, hereby provide this Motion to Withdraw as attorney of
record for Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien. I have recently been appointed by
Governor Brown to the Sacramento County Superior Court and will no longer be
22
23
able to represent Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien. Co-counsel David A. Nickerson will
24
continue to represent Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien in this case.
25
DATED: January 18, 2017
26
27
28
/s/ Scott L. Tedmon
SCOTT L. TEDMON
Attorney for Petitioner
Sean Alan O’Brien
1
ORDER
2
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Scott L. Tedmon’s Motion to Withdraw as
3
attorney of record for Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien is GRANTED. The record shall
4
reflect that Scott L. Tedmon no longer represents Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien in
5
this case. The record shall reflect that co-counsel David A. Nickerson continues to
6
represent Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien in this case.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated: January 20, 2017
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?