O'Brien v. McEwen

Filing 80

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/20/17 GRANTING 78 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Scott L. Tedmon terminated. The record shall reflect that co-counsel David A. Nickerson continues to represent petitioner Sean Alan OBrien in this case.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT L. TEDMON A Professional Corporation SCOTT L. TEDMON, CA. BAR # 96171 980 Ninth Street, 16th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 449-9985 Facsimile: (916) 446-7104 Email: tedmonlaw@comcast.net Attorney for Petitioner SEAN ALAN O’BRIEN 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 SEAN ALAN O’BRIEN, 13 Petitioner, 14 15 16 17 vs. LELAND McEWEN, Respondent. 18 19 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:10-cv-2472 MCE CKD P SCOTT L. TEDMON’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR PETITIONER SEAN ALAN O’BRIEN; ORDER I, Scott L. Tedmon, hereby provide this Motion to Withdraw as attorney of record for Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien. I have recently been appointed by Governor Brown to the Sacramento County Superior Court and will no longer be 22 23 able to represent Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien. Co-counsel David A. Nickerson will 24 continue to represent Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien in this case. 25 DATED: January 18, 2017 26 27 28 /s/ Scott L. Tedmon SCOTT L. TEDMON Attorney for Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien 1 ORDER 2 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Scott L. Tedmon’s Motion to Withdraw as 3 attorney of record for Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien is GRANTED. The record shall 4 reflect that Scott L. Tedmon no longer represents Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien in 5 this case. The record shall reflect that co-counsel David A. Nickerson continues to 6 represent Petitioner Sean Alan O’Brien in this case. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: January 20, 2017 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?