Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 25

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/23/12 ORDERING the parties' stipulation 24 is HEREBY APPROVED. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 ANN M. CERNEY, SBN: 068748 Attorney at Law 45 Hunter Square Plaza Stockton, California 95202 Telephone: (209) 948-9384 Facsimile: (209) 948-0706 4 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 —o0o— 10 11 PAMELA IRENE MOORE, 12 CASE NO. 2:10-CV-02477-KJN Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER SETTLING ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant(s). 16 / 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned 19 counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the 20 Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND 21 SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00/CENTS ($4,750.00). This amount represents 22 compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with 23 this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §[§ 1920,] 2412(d). 24 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government 25 will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s 26 attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, – S.Ct. – , 2010 WL 2346547 (U.S. June 14, 2010), the 27 ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any 28 1 Stipulation and Proposed Order Settling Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 1 offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the 2 order for EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine whether they are 3 subject to any offset. 4 Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the 5 Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause 6 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Ann M. Cerney, pursuant to the 7 assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. 8 9 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of 10 Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release 11 from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to 12 EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action. 13 14 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA. 15 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 Date: April 23, 2012 19 /s/ Ann M. Cerney ANN M. CERNEY, Attorney for Plaintiff 20 21 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Social Security Administration 22 23 24 /s/Elizabeth Firer 25 Date: April 23, 2012 26 27 ELIZABETH FIRER (by email authorization on 4/23/12) Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 28 2 Stipulation and Proposed Order Settling Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 1 ORDER 2 The parties’ stipulation (Dkt. No. 24) is HEREBY APPROVED. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: April 23, 2012 5 6 7 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation and Proposed Order Settling Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?