Dorris v. Adams

Filing 16

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/31/11 ordering that petitioner show cause, within 30 days, why his failure to oppose respondent's 01/14/11 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
(HC) Dorris v. Adams Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. D. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent. / Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 14, 2011, respondent filed a motion to dismiss petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus on statute of limitations grounds. (Dkt. No. 13.) Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within thirty days, why his failure to oppose respondent's January 14, 2011 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NATHAN ANTHONY DORRIS, Petitioner, No. 2:10-cv-02482 FCD KJN P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. DATED: March 31, 2011 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE dorr2482.46hab.kjn 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?