Little v. Marciano et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/21/2011 ORDERING that, within 30 days, plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the 28 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMETRIC LITTLE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. P.A. C. MARCIANO, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 17 No. 2:10-cv-2490 JAM DAD (PC) On November 21, 2011, defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(d) and 41(b). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. 18 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 19 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 20 the granting of the motion . . . .” On February 14, 2011, plaintiff was advised of the requirements 21 for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a 22 waiver of opposition to the motion. 23 Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be 24 grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 25 inherent power of the Court.” In the order filed February 14, 2011, plaintiff was advised that 26 ///// 1 1 failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be 2 dismissed. 3 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the 4 date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a 5 statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this 6 action be pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 7 DATED: December 21, 2011. 8 9 10 11 12 DAD:12 litt2490.46osc 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?