Whitney v. Miranda et al

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/20/2011 GRANTING 23 Defendants' request to conduct plaintiff and witness' depositions via videoconference is GRANTED; Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4

WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
1250 Sutterville Road, Ste. 290
Sacramento, CA 95822
[phone]
[phone] (fax)
Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021
LaKeysia R. Beene, CSB #265078

5
6

Attorneys for defendants
SWINGLE, NEPOMUCENO and MIRANDA

7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

NORMAN WHITNEY,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,

11
12

vs.

13

R. MIRANDA, et al.,
Defendants.

14

Case No. 2:10-cv-02532-FCD-EFB
PROPOSED ORDER

15
ORDER

16

Defendants SWINGLE, NEPOMUCENO and MIRANDA seek an order from the

17
18

Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendants’

19

counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff NORMAN WHITNEY and all witnesses in

20

this case via videoconference.

21

Having read defense counsel’s request,

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

23

1.

Defendants’ request to conduct plaintiff and witness’ depositions via

24

videoconference is GRANTED.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

Whitney v. Miranda [2:10-cv-02532-FCD-EFB] Order

Page 1

1

2.

Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution

2

to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.

3

Dated: June 20, 2011.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Whitney v. Miranda [2:10-cv-02532-FCD-EFB] Order

Page 2