Saunders v. The Law Offices of Elaine Van Beveren et al

Filing 28

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/7/11 CONTINUING Status (pretrial scheduling) Conference to 12/8/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ROBERT SAUNDERS,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14

No. 2:10-cv-02559 GEB KJN PS

v.
THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
CALIFORNIA; THE LAW OFFICES
OF ELAINE VAN BEVEREN; ELAINE
VAN BEVEREN, Individually,

15
Defendants.
16

ORDER
/

17

A status (pretrial scheduling) conference in this action is set to take place on

18

October 20, 2011.1 (See Minute Order, Aug. 31, 2011, Dkt. No. 24; Order and Findings and

19

Recommendations, July 13, 2011, at 20, Dkt. No. 22.) On October 4, 2011, plaintiff filed his

20

Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 27) pursuant to the court’s September 6, 2011 order (Dkt.

21

No. 25). Because the undersigned is required to screen plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint

22

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (see Order and Findings and Recommendations, July 13,

23

2011, at 20), the status (pretrial scheduling) conference is continued to allow time for such

24

screening, the possible service of the Second Amended Complaint on defendant County of

25
1

26

This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California
Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
1

1

Sacramento if appropriate, and the possible filing of pleadings-based motions pursuant to Federal

2

Rule of Civil Procedure 12.

3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status (pretrial scheduling)

4

conference presently set for October 20, 2011, is continued to December 8, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.,

5

in Courtroom 25.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 7, 2011

8
9
10

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2